This article reports on a three-year investigation into how and to what extent ePortfolios sponsor teacher and student learning about audience in first-year writing classes at a mid-sized research university. Through interviews with students and instructors and detailed analysis of students’ ePortfolios, we found that, more often than not, the audience for ePortfolios is multiple. We argue that the ability to craft compositions that successfully negotiate multiple audiences’ needs and expectations is a critical twenty-first century skill, yet the concept of audience is under-investigated and under-theorized in ePortfolio research. Our study provides evidence that working with ePortfolios shifted the ways that students and instructors engaged with the concept of audience. We observed that many student ePortfolios at least gestured toward invoking multiple audiences. We further observed considerable variance in how successfully students negotiated the needs and expectations of these audiences, often experiencing a phenomenon we call “audience interference.” We identified three key rhetorical moves that largely determined the success of the ePortfolio in negotiating multiple audiences’ needs and expectations: intentional design of structure and navigation; contextualization of content and artifacts; and flexible use of voices. We conclude by suggesting pedagogical implications of these findings.
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.
Abstract:
This article reports on a three-year investigation into how and to what extent ePortfolios sponsor
teacher and student learning about audience in first-year writing classes at a mid-sized research
university. Through interviews with students and instructors and detailed analysis of students’
ePortfolios, we found that, more often than not, the audience for ePortfolios is multiple. We argue
that the ability to craft compositions that successfully negotiate multiple audiences’ needs and
expectations is a critical twenty-first century skill, yet the concept of audience is under-investigated
and under-theorized in ePortfolio research. Our study provides evidence that working with
ePortfolios shifted the ways that students and instructors engaged with the concept of audience. We
observed that many student ePortfolios at least gestured toward invoking multiple audiences. We
further observed considerable variance in how successfully students negotiated the needs and
expectations of these audiences, often experiencing a phenomenon we call “audience interference.”
We identified three key rhetorical moves that largely determined the success of the ePortfolio in
negotiating multiple audiences’ needs and expectations: intentional design of structure and
navigation; contextualization of content and artifacts; and flexible use of voices. We conclude by
suggesting pedagogical implications of these findings.